Follow-up to blogs posted over the past year on the treatment of disregarded entities under the Michigan Business Tax. The Michigan Department of Treasury has further extended the due date for federally disregarded entities to file Michigan Business Tax returns to December 31, 2011, without penalty (previously the due date was October 31, 2011).
Recap:
The notice instructs by stating, a person that is a disregarded entity for federal tax purposes, including a single member limited liability company (LLC) or QSub, must file a separate return under the MBT or file as a member of a unitary business group. The requirement is based on Kmart Michigan Property Services LLC v. Department of Treasury, which held that a single member LLC was required to file a Single Business Tax (SBT) return, regardless of its classification as a disregarded entity for federal tax purposes.
Status of Legislative Fix:
Senate Bill (SB369) provides a fix, and allows a person (as defined under the MBT Act) who is a disregarded entity for federal tax purposes (including a single member limited liability company or QSub), to file one return under the MBT.
The bill seems to be stuck in committee. The bill was introduced on May 10, 2011 by Senators Brandenburg & Bieda and referred to the Committee on Finance, the bill has not moved since it was introduced. Hopefully there will be movement on the bill rectifying the issue by the end of the year.
Send a comment and let me know what you’re thinking about this!
Taxpayers in Michigan still have one more MBT return to file and all MBT returns are open for audit. The seminar covers a variety of MBT tax return filing considerations, MBT audit issues and the future of unused MBT credits. Also, get an overview of the numerous changes to the Individual Income Tax and the new Corporate Income Tax – who is subject to it, the tax base, the tax rate and the credits against the new tax.
Instructors: Ron Kaley & Ed Kisscorni
Registration: Ctrl+Click on the city of your choice to go to the MACPA website
When: Monday, September 26, 2011 – Grand Rapids; Friday, September 30, 2011 – Auburn Hills; Friday, October 21, 2011 – Novi; Tuesday, October 25, 2011 – Traverse City
Recommended CPE Credit (each day): 8 Other hours
Treasury has commented on the following areas of recently enacted legislation. I have hyperlinked the text below, you may click on the word to go to Treasury's website and read more on a particular area:
The comments reflect the law with new terms such as, "Total Household Resources." This term replaces, "Total Household Income" and impacts more than the Homestead Property Tax Credit. "Total Household Resources" impacts the personal exemption phase-out, the senior retirement exemption and the homestead property tax credit. In addition to the expanded use, it carries with it a slight but important change in calculation. The new term excludes losses from business, rentals, royalties and net operating losses.
A "Retirement Changes" chart is provided that will help make sense of what categories your client fits when determining how pensions are taxed or not, based on the age of the taxpayer. Don't forget, when a joint return is filed, the age of the eldest spouse dictates how pension income is taxed for both spouses.
In Corporate Income Tax Changes comments, treasury provides useful information, identifies Michigan's nexus standard, and provides a link to another document listing certificated credits. If your client has certificated credits, they may elect to keep filing the MBT until the certificated credit is used. The election must be made with the first filing after December 31, 2011. You will still need to calculate the tax both ways, MBT vs. CIT and apply the credit against the higher of the two taxes.
Changes discussed in Withholding Changes comments mainly focus on withholding on payments from pension and retirement distributions. There are other areas to consider such as non-resident shareholder withholding as a result of income from pass-through entities.
In future blogs I will continue to discuss some of the practical applications of enacted legislation.
In previous blog posts, I wrote about changes to Michigan's pension exclusion where I discussed the three age categories taxpayers will fall into and described what impact it will have on the taxation of public and private pensions. I also discussed a new exemption called the "Senior Income Exemption" which, for the most part, replaces the eliminated pension exclusion. All the changes I discussed are effective January 1, 2012. Additionally, I blogged about the changes to the personal exemption, introducing a new concept -- the phase-out for the personal exemption. The phase-out is based on “Total Household Resources."
In this blog post I will describe the limitation, or in most cases the outright elimination, of several personal refundable and non-refundable credits.
Effective 1/1/2012 the following changes are made to the following credits:
Non-Refundable Credits:
1. Eliminated - Credit for city income taxes
2. Eliminated - Credit for public contributions
3. Eliminated - Credit for contributions to homeless shelters, food banks, and community foundations
4. Eliminated - Credit for contributions to medical savings accounts
5. Eliminated - Credit for donations to the Family Development Program
1. Reduced - Earned Income Tax Credit from 20% to 6%
2. Repealed - Excess adoption expense credit
3. Repealed - Stillbirth credit
4. Changed - Homestead property tax credit as follows:
· Household income is replaced by total household resources which excludes losses from business, rentals and royalties and also excludes net operating losses
· Available only for homes with taxable value of less than $135,000
· For senior claimants
- full credit of 100% if total household resources are $21,000 or less and reduced by 4% for each additional $1,000 in total household resources until $30,000 is reached
- for total household resources of $30,000 to $41,000 senior claimants receive 60% of the credit
· All other claimants are eligible for 60% of the tax credit
· Credit phase out begins at $41,000 of total household resources and is reduced by 10% for each $1,000 increase; complete phase-out at $50,000
5. Still Available - alternative credit for eligible service person/veteran
6. Repealed - the film credit for wage withholding
7. Repealed - the credit for automobile donations
8. Repealed - the credit for college tuition and fees
9. Repealed - the credits for historic rehabilitation plans certified after 2011
If you did not pull out a Michigan Form 1040 as you read through this blog post, go back, get a 2010 MI-form 1040 and compare it to the list above. You will note the sweeping changes to the credits effective January 1, 2012. Many of you have clients who benefitted from the non-refundable credits and the Homestead property tax credit; they will face an increase in their personal tax liability as a result of the changes made to the law.
In my previous blog I wrote about changes to Michigan's pension exclusion. There are other changes to consider which limit or eliminate exemptions, deductions and credits. In this blog post I describe the limitation or outright elimination of the personal exemptions.
1) Personal exemption phase-out
Under prior law, $3,700 (TY 2011, indexed to inflation) was exempt from Adjusted Gross Income for each personal exemption claimed on the federal income tax return.
New Law phases-out the personal exemption for single taxpayers between the income range of $75,000 and $100,000 and for married taxpayers between the income range of $150,000 and $200,000.
Taxpayers with incomes above the upper bound receive no personal exemption. The formula for the phasing out of the exemption (single filer) is:
Personal Exemption multiplied by:
$100,000 – Total Household Resources
$25,000
2) Eliminate the $2,300 for each taxpayer and every dependent of the taxpayer who is 65 years of age or older. When a dependent of a taxpayer files an annual return under this act, the taxpayer or dependent of the taxpayer, but not both, may claim the additional exemption allowed under this subdivision.
3) Eliminate the $2,300 (TY 2010, indexed to inflation) special exemptions for seniors and individuals with unemployment compensation equal to or greater than 50% of their AGI (adjusted gross income, Michigan's starting point from the federal return).
4) Eliminate the $600 additional exemption per dependent child under the age of 19.
What I have found is the number of changes made to the individual income tax act surprises most. Many are aware of the changes to the pension exclusion because of the amount of press received. What you will see throughout the series of blogs is the elimination and changes made to the exemptions, credits and deductions previously available. With the elimination of the Michigan Business Tax, these changes are meant to help plug an estimated 1.7 billion dollar reduction in amount collected under the new corporate income tax.
Changes to Michigan’s individual income tax (starting in 2012) have received a lot of press -- especially the changes to the pension exclusion. Given all the questions surrounding the changes to the pension exclusion, I thought I would reiterate the changes to the law. Taxpayers will be classified into one of three categories (shown in bold below):
These taxpayers at any age may claim personal exemptions for which they are eligible and may exempt Social Security income. However, the $20,000/$40,000 exemption is not available when total household resources exceed $75,000 for a single return or $150,000 for a joint return.
(1) the taxpayer has a choice between the $20,000/40,000 exemption against all types of income, with no personal exemptions and with no additional exemption for Social Security
or
(2) continuing the exemption for Social Security, along with the personal exemptions for which they are eligible.
However, the $20,000/$40,000 exemption is not available where total household resources exceed $75,000 for a single return or $150,000 for a joint return.
The pension exclusion is dependent on one's age and determines which of the three categories the taxation of pension income fits. If a joint return is filed, the age of the eldest spouse controls which category all pension income fits and how the pension income is taxed.
History:
You may remember the deferred income tax adjustment was one of the many confusing issues with the MBT. The MBT is considered an income tax, whereas the SBT was not considered an income tax. This change in taxation required many companies to book a deferred tax adjustment (often times a liability) for the MBT starting with the first period after July 12, 2007 (date of enactment).
Because of the initial deferred tax adjustment, most business’ balance sheets post SBT were reduced in value as a result of booking the deferred MBT liability. The legislature heard this and amended the law to allow for a one-time adjustment, creating an offsetting future deduction which was a deferred tax asset to the extent of the initial deferred tax liability. This deduction, which cannot be used until 2015, reduces the business income tax base on a proportional basis each year through 2029. With the repeal of the MBT (for most taxpayers) what happens to the MBT Deferred Tax asset created?
Current Impact to Financials with the Repeal of the MBT:
Now that the MBT is repealed for companies (with the exception of a few who have "Certificated Credits” who may elect to keep filing the MBT) the asset created will be written-off. What this translates to for financial statement purposes (i.e. GAAP Basis Financial Statements) is a reduction to book income to the extent of the MBT asset created for the first period ending after July 12, 2007. Companies not publicly traded with a December year-end most likely made this adjustment based on the balance sheet date of December 31, 2007.
What About the Michigan Corporate Income Tax?
Does history repeat itself? As with the implementation of the MBT, there are similar concerns with the Michigan Corporate Income Tax (CIT). Will taxpayers be able to carryover the deferred liability created under MBT to the CIT? Maybe but seems unlikely.
However, Senate Bill 480, introduced on June 16, 2001 will allow a unitary business group who filed the Michigan Business Tax, "Book-Tax Difference", "Form 4593". If enacted, the bill allows a unitary taxpayer to carryover it's deferred tax asset and to adjust its business income to account for the assets that generated the book-tax differences reported on "Form 4593". The adjustment would apply in computation of sale of disposition of assets creating the initial deferred liability under the MBT.
Considering the language of Senate Bill 480, what about non-unitary filers who filed Form 4593?
In addition to the write-off of the asset created under the MBT, c-corporations are faced with recording a deferred tax liability under the new CIT. For those c-corporations who issue quarterly financial statements, this issue is relevant as of October 1, 2011.
Pass-through entities will not have a deferred tax liability under the new CIT. Pass-through entities are not subject to the business entity tax they had in Michigan under the SBT and MBT, and must write-off the net MBT deferred tax amount.
Major Tax Reform in Michigan is here. Effective January 1, 2012, the following Public Acts make sweeping changes to Michigan's Income Tax structure.
Public Act 38 of 2011 amends the Income Tax Act, eliminating numerous credits, deductions and exemptions, as well as changing future tax rates. Public Act 38 also creates the new Corporate Income Tax, which will be levied on businesses organized as traditional corporations under Federal law. The Act divides the Income Tax Act into two parts: Part One contains changes in the existing personal income tax, and Part Two, which is entirely new, contains provisions for a corporate income tax.
Public Act 39 of 2011 amends the Michigan Business Tax (MBT) Act to allow certain taxpayers that wish to claim select credits allowed under the law to continue claiming those credits if they continue to file returns under the MBT Act.
Public Act 40 of 2011 amends the Multistate Tax Compact to remove the option for certain out-of-state taxpayers to apportion their tax base (under either the MBT or the new Corporate Income Tax) using an equally weighted three-factor formula instead of the 100%-sales factor formula specified in the MBT and the Corporate Income Tax.
Over the next few blog posts I will identify many of the changes. In the next blog I will discuss perhaps one of the most controversial changes, and thought to be a significant revenue raiser, Eliminating, Limiting, and Restructuring the Exemption for Pension and Retirement Income.
The change to the exemption through Public Act 38 of 2011 phases-out the exemption for pension and retirement income for seniors.
There are several seminar offerings through the MACPA starting Friday June 3rd. Here is the link so you may view the locations where the seminars are offered and sign-up:
http://www.ehtc.com/ehtc/eventssalt.htm
The seminar on June 9th, 2011 is a 1 hour presentation on legislative updates at both the federal and state level; all other seminars are 8 hour sessions on the MBT and the changes to the income tax structure that I identified in this blog post.
On April 28, 2011, the Michigan House of Representatives passed a bill that will, if enacted, implement numerous corporate and personal income tax changes that Gov. Rick Snyder proposed in his budget.
Key points included in the bill:
In addition, business taxpayers with a certificated credit will, for the first tax year after 2011 only, be able to elect to pay the Michigan Business Tax instead of the corporate income tax. Such taxpayers can continue to pay the MBT until the credit and any carryforward are used up. The MBT would be repealed after all the certificated credits were claimed. Generally, the bills would be effective January 1, 2012.
Share your thoughts on the most recent budget proposal, here we go again...
On April 30, 2011, the Michigan Department of Treasury revised its notice regarding federally disregarded entities and the Michigan Business Tax, originally published on November 29, 2010. The notice is revised to extend the time for filing amended returns free of penalties from June 30, 2011 until October 31, 2011.
I wrote a blog on the notice issued on November 30, 2010, blog linked here. That blog describes in detail, key points of the notice that have not changed. In addition, I have linked the revised notice here so you may view and download it.
Last, there are ongoing efforts for a legislative solution; hopefully there will be something to report soon.
Give me a call at 616-575-3482 or reply to the Blog if you want to share your thoughts.